![]() | vaticancatholic.com - English Channel |
Download Audio — File Size: 10.0 MB — Duration: 10:58 As we’ve pointed out, it’s a logical progression for people to go from non-sedevacantist to sedevacantist, because it’s the duty of every Catholic to accept the man who purports to be the Bishop of Rome as the Pope, unless there’s clear evidence of an invalid election or manifest heresy. So if someone is supposedly elected by the supposed College of Cardinals and installed as the supposed Pope, it is a Catholics duty to accept and acknowledge him as the Pope. It would be a logical progression for people to go from holding the position that some of these Vatican II antipopes are true popes, until they come across the evidence which persuades them and convinces them that they are not popes and that was the case with Most Holy Family Monastery. |
Was Bro. Michael Dimond always a Sedevacantist?
March 11, 2010
SHOW MORE
Latest News
RFK JR: “Pediatricians who vaccinate 80-85% of the kids in their office, get these giant bonuses…" - video
Scientists working on mRNA shots for "every imaginable infectious disease," researcher claims
"Michelle Obama" says "As a black man…" appearing to speak about "herself" - video
Stephen Miller explains why the issue of gangs is so important - video
"Proposed change to India anti-conversion law could see Christians put to death for evangelizing"