![]() | vaticancatholic.com - English Channel |
Download Audio — File Size: 10.0 MB — Duration: 10:58 As we’ve pointed out, it’s a logical progression for people to go from non-sedevacantist to sedevacantist, because it’s the duty of every Catholic to accept the man who purports to be the Bishop of Rome as the Pope, unless there’s clear evidence of an invalid election or manifest heresy. So if someone is supposedly elected by the supposed College of Cardinals and installed as the supposed Pope, it is a Catholics duty to accept and acknowledge him as the Pope. It would be a logical progression for people to go from holding the position that some of these Vatican II antipopes are true popes, until they come across the evidence which persuades them and convinces them that they are not popes and that was the case with Most Holy Family Monastery. |
Was Bro. Michael Dimond always a Sedevacantist?
March 11, 2010
SHOW MORE
Latest News
"California priest says God is ‘proud’ of ‘LGBT Catholics’ during homily at ‘Family Pride Mass’"
Epstein story has been PR nightmare for Israel - Israel asked for the case to be closed and it was – video
Bill O'Reilly says Trump told him releasing Epstein files would allow the media to smear innocent people
Trump originally was a major figure bringing publicity and attention to the Epstein case - video
10 Dangerous Foods RFK Jr. Just Banned - video